The paradoxes of integration Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1000 words - 1

The paradoxes of integration - Essay Example However, this has not really been the case in most parts of America. There have been challenges with the campaign to get Blacks, Whites, Asian and people of mixed races to co-exist in the same geographical area. Gould states that: Clearly, most White people do not really stay in neighborhoods that has a large African-American population. This is because some White Americans have prejudice and stereotypes that make the associate Black people with some anti-social behaviors. Gould calls this situation ‘white avoidance’ and it largely refers to the fact that most White Americans decide not to move into an integrated neighborhood (p4). In the past few decades, the new wave of immigration from Asia and Latin America has also shown that America is a multi-cultural setting (Oliver, 2). This suggests that the need for integration to solve racial tensions and differences now exceeds just the Black-White conflict which has existed in America for some time. Although there are signs that Americans choose a neighborhood based on the background of their neighbors, Katz and Lang identify that there are some additional key indicators that Americans look at when choosing a neighborhood they live in. they include: â€Å"job opportunities, their children’s schools, their commute, their future home worth, their healthcare, and their places of worship and congregation.† (p1) This suggests that most Americans look at certain factors other than the skin color or the racial background of their neighbors, there is evidence that racial differences play a major role in choosing a neighborhood an American will live in. People more often than not, settle on neighborhoods that is made up of people of their racial or ethnic background. A survey by MCSUI conducted between 1992 and 1994 (Oliver, p103) indicated that about 50% of Asians and Whites will prefer to live in neighborhoods containing people of

Balanced Score Card Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 3500 words

Balanced Score Card - Essay Example According to various studies, the Balanced Score Card system affects strategy at the levels of finance, customer, internal, and growth. One advantage of this strategy is that it relies significantly on measurable outcomes that weigh against specific goals as spelt out in the organization’s specific mission and vision. According to a range of financial management literature, the application of the Balanced Score Card is manifest at the financial level of strategy (Punniyamoorthy, & Murali, 2008; Figge, Hahn, Schaltegger, & Wagner, 2002, p. 269). This is because, financial growth strategies are comparably easier to ascertain as compared to the other levels of strategy as customer growth and satisfaction. The universal characteristic of these strategies involve the active application of specific periods within certain financial goals are measured (Brown & McDonnell, 1995). The levels of success or failure are measured within the specified period in order to obtain the most accurate standards of measurement as spelt out within specific growth objectives and strategies. On this score, it becomes appropriate to consider the fact that time factor remains one of the most important considerations of the rate of growth. Financial Management In many organizations, the determination of growth using the Balanced Score Card method involves the determination of revenue growths and profits (Chavan, 2009). This usually entails the determination of the rate of growth in profits as understood together with certain financial measurable. The application of the strategy involves the determination of the strategic growth objectives and the outcome measures as the key determinants of growth within the strategy (Chavan, 2009). For instance, within a manufacturing company, strategic growth could involve the determination of various strategies for growth and other processes (Brown, & McDonnell, 1995). Some of the issues that relate to the development of strategy within the understanding of the Balanced Score Card relate to the need to adjust outcomes within definite operational paradigms. On this matter, it is necessary to consider the fact that the application of strategy remains an integral issue that applies within various factors an d strategies of growth. The determination of specific outcome measures assists in providing the management with specific indicators of telling whether the strategy relates well with the projected goals (Chavan, 2009). The assumption is that the end-result is significantly a factor of the strategy within, which it was achieved. The relationship between outcome and process depends on the manner in which the strategy relates with the financial objectives and the ability of the management to harness all the other aspects of the strategy towards the attainment of the same. The various processes that attach to strategy relate to other application specifics that combine to form some continuous link between the starting point of the strategy and the budgeted outcomes (Chavan, 2009). Critics of the Balanced Score Card strategy contend that other variables apart from the mechanics of the strategy could be involved in the achievement of the specific goals of the organization. Organization proc esses are subject to multiple internal and external factors, which affect the processes in different